...

carrina. 20. duke university.


home inbox theme

still dont understand how people can still think that panda is real chinese food… like really????? does “shanghai angus steak” sound chinese to you in anyway??

2
56613

if you want more'
39487
93653
425161
29781
90457
35
77346

Anisia Kuzmina ph.
542
lacewings:

Rhea Thierstein - Preserved rose in jelly
ph: Tim Walker
531

overlypolitebisexual:

cat people: dogs are cool too
dog people: cats don’t feel love did you know a cat once MURDERED my MOTHER

131980
631
forloveanlemons:

For Love and Lemons SHE’S A KNOCKOUT BRA, PEEK-A-BOO T BACK BRALETTE  
4122
hi-coup:

cloudcuckoolander527:

yayfeminism:

One would assume that scientists, who are trained to think objectively, are completely immune to gender discrimination. However, a recent Yale study by Corinne Moss-Racusin and colleagues suggests otherwise.
The researchers created a fictional student and sent out the student’s application to science professors at top, research-intensive universities in the United States. The professors were asked to evaluate how competent this student was, how likely they would be to hire the student, how much they would pay this student, and how willing they would be to mentor the student. All of the applications sent out were identical, except for the fact that half were for a male applicant, John, and half were for a female applicant, Jennifer. Results showed that, with statistical significance, both male and female faculty at these institutions were biased towards male students over female students.
Data from the study shows that on average, science faculty was willing to pay the male applicant about $4,000 more per year. source

"The gender gap doesn’t exist" 
"We don’t need feminism" 
"Maybe he just worked harder"
"*any MRA bullshit*"

I had to read this study for class. It is thorough as fuck.
49153